Aesthetics of Hand-Drawn vs. Computer-Generated Stippling

dc.contributor.authorMaciejewski, Rossen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsenberg, Tobiasen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, William M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEbert, David S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Mario Costaen_US
dc.contributor.editorDouglas W. Cunningham and Gary Meyer and Laszlo Neumannen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-22T07:39:40Z
dc.date.available2013-10-22T07:39:40Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.description.abstractRecent work in non-photorealistic rendering has produced results comparable to hand-drawn artistic images. Inspiration for such techniques has come from many traditional artistic techniques, such as pen-and-ink, to depict tone, depth, and shape. These techniques can create visually appealing images and increase understanding as is evident in their use in medical textbooks, popular science, etc. However, when computer-generated images are visually compared to similar hand-drawn images, studies have shown that subjects are generally able to determine differences between both images. This seems to indicate that there are different aesthetics associated with computer-generated images and hand-drawn images. This paper discusses the implications of varying aesthetics amongst hand-drawn and computer-generated images, focusing particularly on the application of stippling to provide tone and shape to an image.en_US
dc.description.seriesinformationComputational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imagingen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-905673-43-2en_US
dc.identifier.issn1816-0859en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2312/COMPAESTH/COMPAESTH07/053-056en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.titleAesthetics of Hand-Drawn vs. Computer-Generated Stipplingen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
053-056.pdf
Size:
364.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format