Mobile and Multimodal? A Comparative Evaluation of Interactive Workplaces for Visual Data Exploration

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLeón, Gabriela Molinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLischka, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Weien_US
dc.contributor.authorBreiter, Andreasen_US
dc.contributor.editorBorgo, Ritaen_US
dc.contributor.editorMarai, G. Elisabetaen_US
dc.contributor.editorSchreck, Tobiasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-03T06:06:24Z
dc.date.available2022-06-03T06:06:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractMobile devices are increasingly being used in the workplace. The combination of touch, pen, and speech interaction with mobile devices is considered particularly promising for a more natural experience. However, we do not yet know how everyday work with multimodal data visualizations on a mobile device differs from working in the standard WIMP workplace setup. To address this gap, we created a visualization system for social scientists, with a WIMP interface for desktop PCs, and a multimodal interface for tablets. The system provides visualizations to explore spatio-temporal data with consistent WIMP and multimodal interaction techniques. To investigate how the different combinations of devices and interaction modalities affect the performance and experience of domain experts in a work setting, we conducted an experiment with 16 social scientists where they carried out a series of tasks with both interfaces. Participants were significantly faster and slightly more accurate on the WIMP interface. They solved the tasks with different strategies according to the interaction modalities available. The pen was the most used and appreciated input modality. Most participants preferred the multimodal setup and could imagine using it at work. We present our findings, together with their implications for the interaction design of data visualizations.en_US
dc.description.number3
dc.description.sectionheadersSocial Sciences, Mobile, and VR/AR
dc.description.seriesinformationComputer Graphics Forum
dc.description.volume41
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cgf.14551
dc.identifier.issn1467-8659
dc.identifier.pages417-428
dc.identifier.pages12 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14551
dc.identifier.urihttps://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.1111/cgf14551
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCCS Concepts: Human-centered computing --> Empirical studies in visualization; Interaction design; Applied computing --> Law, social and behavioral sciences
dc.subjectHuman centered computing
dc.subjectEmpirical studies in visualization
dc.subjectInteraction design
dc.subjectApplied computing
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectsocial and behavioral sciences
dc.titleMobile and Multimodal? A Comparative Evaluation of Interactive Workplaces for Visual Data Explorationen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 12
Thumbnail Image
Name:
v41i3pp417-428.pdf
Size:
4.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1295-file1.mp4
Size:
58.76 MB
Format:
Unknown data format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
comparison-survey.pdf
Size:
64.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
intro-multimodal.pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
intro-wimp.pdf
Size:
1.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
41-Issue 3